I cut the child allowance method of the Democratic Party! The reason why they promote the principle of age of the education?

The list of good media

I cannot discover the place taking up about this problem properly for the moment.

Main contents

• A top page
• About our site
• A past flow (chronological order)
• The commentary of the provision requirements camouflage problem
  (the matter of the manifesto written on the cover)
• A commentary of the issue of educational background standardization
  (a matter of the age expression of the text)(non-making)
• A commentary of the issue of application guidance defect
  (a matter of the omission of provision application induction)(non-making)
• An issue of child allowance good question
  (FAQ)
• An action record
• A bulletin board and a source of information
• A sound and an animation

Subcontents

• The basic knowledge of the child allowance
• Useless media
• Good media
• A well-informed person / a member of the Diet (non-making)
• An opinion destination (non-making)
• Old high school gratuitousness the problem (non-making) of the bill
• With the principle of age of the education (non-making)
• The manipulation (non-making) of the national census
• Is school description under 18 years old limitation?
  (the young people healthy upbringing regulations)(non-making)

■About an address
Please write it towards a thread basically because I read this thread (there is a link on a bulletin board and the page of the source of information) of 2ch irregularly if there is it what it is.

■About a copyright
I offer the copyright of this site in CC-BY. If this is the license which is the nearest to copyright free and writes clearly that this site is the source, every use is possible. I welcome the making of a mirror site and the site where I corrected. But please do not take off the link to Nikukyu-Punch of the bedrock when I misappropriate a design.