Do you know it?
1, provision of the child allowance "are not to graduation from junior high school"!
It is written in 2, the text of the child allowance method that I "call 18 years old graduation from high school age"!
I may be left out of the provision when I follow 3, the application guide of the government office!
The problems of the child allowance who does not report anywhere for some reason
■A child allowance system began in 2010 in Japan.
Cash is provided the household with resident registration or the alien
registration with depending on the number of people of the child before
the end in school age. There is not the limit by the sum of an income
and savings and becomes a target if I apply.
■A big lie is included in the news of official announcement and the mass media of the Democratic Party about the child allowance. In addition, the text causing the issue of serious human rights is included in the child allowance method. About this, it is not reported in most media. What I prepared this site into is because I thought that I must tell all of you about this.
▼The problem separates you greatly, and there is three.
The lie of the 1 problems manifesto
■One is the
announcement that is different from the fact about a person becoming
the provision requirements of the child allowance.
I am considered to be "provision to graduation from junior high school"
in the manifesto of the Democratic Party. The mass media reports it in
imitation of this, too. Called "a ninth grader provision", "junior high
school completion provision" may be the form, but is the same meaning.
However, it is completely decided whether it is really a provision
object at age and has nothing to do at all whether it is a junior high
student whether you graduate. For example, in the people graduating
from a junior high school in 16 years old or more, provision is
canceled at 15 years old.
With "until the end of the school age", you should write it until "a day before 15-year-old April 1" if I convey the content of an enforced system, but educational background to have nothing to do with" to graduation from junior high school" at all is really written without writing so it.
The text which denies the life of the 2 problems reality
■It is a way of
writing that does not accept individual difference of educational
background written in the text of the child allowance method one more.
In the text of the child allowance, as for "the graduation of the
elementary school, as for "the graduation of the junior high school, as
for "the graduation of the high school, there are 18 years old" and a
sentence to be able to read 15 years old" 12 years old". I do not
understand it only by having had a look at it because I do a complexed
form, but do a way of writing that fixed age and educational
background. However, it is legal to graduate at age except age written
here, and there are many examples. In addition, I may not go to school
at the age. As for this text, all the members consider educational
background of Japanese to be the same and I deny personality and
standardize the life.
It is the point that I treated about expense paid by the local government, and this part of the law is not the text for commoners, but the reason that let the principle of age steal in incomprehensible form here expressly is good and does not understand it.
The guidance document which pretends that I am the 3 problems application-free
■In addition, a guidance document was made with a premise that "all children belonged to the grade of the school at at least age" when a local government called for the provision application of the child allowance. There was hereby the example which an application leak produced because it was done with "an application unnecessary" when I followed the guidance document about some cases which were not provided with if I did not originally apply including the primary schoolchild and seventh grader 13 years or older at the first day in the year.
In addition, approximately 300,000 people were non-application among the people who needed application at the point in time in September, 2010. However, I do not understand the number that a defect influenced of guidance sentences precisely because there is the person whom I did not apply for because in the first place I do not hope for a receipt. This should be a problem only for the system start first year, but people performing such a careless paperwork will repeat a similar thing again.
The problem of other bills of the Democratic Party
■The bill had the problem that was promoted with an age limit being hidden at first high school gratuitousness.
Because
an age limit was withdrawn, this problem is settled, but the
composition of the problem is identical to the issue of child allowance
now.
■The
Democratic Party pushes forward activity after 2010 to maintain a human
rights violations relief bill (a protection of human rights bill) in
earnest.
Because it is already touched in various sites, I do not explain the
problems of this bill here, but cannot think that such a human rights
sense is dull and is calm, and a party denying an older age student can
handle a human rights problem directly. Perhaps it will be the crooked
system that only a power base of the Democratic Party supports.
For solution
■I send a lot of inquiries to a political party or the mass media, but there is not an improved sign at all for the moment. To Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, I do not put even that there was an inquiry on the correspondence record of the net exhibition. There will be hardly the effect even if I send an opinion and protest to such an organization.
■It is important that I have many people know this problem.
There
are many people with the interest about a child allowance, but there do
not seem to be yet many people knowing this problem. If you have this
talk, I may offer a fresh topic. I share a critical mind among the
people, and it is important to continue having distrust of politician
and communications at grass-root level. Only the Democratic Party is
not bad, and it is necessary to recognize that a member of the Diet and
the lie that do not take up this problem and the communications which I
know it, and write an article in the announcement street of the
Democratic Party are bad well.
Finally
■Thought called "the principle of in the education age" affects a series of problems.
In
various countries in the world, Japan is extremely a strong country of
the principle of age. Because a person brought up in the education
environment where people of various fields such as the Democratic Party
and another party, administration and an educational front, the mass
media are like the principle of age is the majority, there is the soil
where the principle of age is easy to fall into an alone absolute
thought. It casts a gloomy shadow over the educational front to treat
existence in itself of the person as a few thing because it is the
minority, and Japan will begin to go ahead through the way to education
destroying a country in terms of age.
※I am correcting it little by little in order to make it the completeness that I can understand enough only in this site, but a commentary look at lack and the to feel towards Wikipedia because contents are not still substantial.
