The past flow of the child allowance
■The manifesto that did not accord with a bill considerably for some time of the change of government or the self-manifesto that contradicted it continued being announced as follows. On the other hand, I appeared suddenly two months before the law approval, and the expression that fixed the age in the text and educational background of the K-12 right slid it in the form of the surprise.
- The story of the child allowance came out in this manifesto for the first time. About the object, it is written as "a child to compulsory education end age". There is not the notation with "the graduation from junior high school". In addition, this PDF file does not have good how to make because I cannot search the contents.
- Another name of this bill is a child allowance bill. I define it when I call "a child after 9-year-old April 1" "a child after the elementary school the third grade completion" in the text. It is not written about a junior high school, the high school. But a comparison list of the announcement has the expression called "the child to junior high school completion" at the same time. In addition, it is written in the press release that "compulsory education spreads by junior high school completion to be over in the Democratic Party plan". It was rejected by the House of Representatives.
- I define it when I call "a child after 9-year-old April 1" "a child after the elementary school the third grade completion" in the text. It is not written about a junior high school, the high school. But a comparison list of the announcement has the expression called "the child to junior high school completion" at the same time. In addition, it is written in the press release that "compulsory education spreads by junior high school completion to be over in the Democratic Party plan". As for this bill, the approval was not rejected, too.
- It is written as "a child to compulsory education completion". There is not the notation with "the graduation from junior high school".
- It is written to "junior high school graduation".
- On the page same about a child allowance of "the compulsory education end provision" and "junior high school graduation provision" expression keeps regular. On the other hand, it "is to the compulsory education end", and, in the life that is the separate volume of this manifesto, there is not the notation with "the graduation from junior high school".
- An elementary school, a junior high school, none of the high school come out to the text. But press release of the announcement has the expression with "the child to junior high school completion" at the same time. As for this bill, the approval was not rejected, too.
- An elementary school, a junior high school, none of the high school come out to the text. But press release of the announcement has the expression with "the child to junior high school graduation" at the same time. As for this bill, the approval was not rejected, too.
- An elementary school, a junior high school, none of the high school come out to the text. But press release of the announcement has the expression with "the child to junior high school graduation" at the same time. As for this bill, the approval was not rejected, too.
- There is not the expression to "the compulsory education end", but it is written as "provision to graduation from junior high school".
- It is said to have let the Democratic Party make rapid progress to have advocated a child allowance system.
- The text of "elementary school completion = 12 years old, junior high school completion = 15 years old, high school completion = 18 years old" increased. It is a law only for 1.
- About this problem, it was coped by providing it with an equal grant.
- This problem was not repaired, and it was forced a vote. In addition, for the children's allowance method era of the Liberal Democratic Party, there was similar rule.
- I became the real thing from presentation at last in only two months. The problem of the child resident in a nursing home and a foreign country happened the other day, and, as for the issue of human rights of the important text, it was not argued.
- There is much local government which I guide you, and cause an application leak which is unjust about a target person needing application here.
- The part which is not outstanding has the notation with "the child who is lower than a junior high student".
◆I announce the version manifesto in 2005 on August 30, 2005
▲A draft of a proposed law (a 2006 version old bill) to revise a part of the children's allowance method on March 3, 2006 submits it to the House of Representatives
▲A version old bill submits it to the House of Councilors in 2006 on March 22, 2006
◆I announce policy index 2007 on January 17, 2007
◆I announce important point policy 50 on June 20, 2007
◆I announce the version manifesto in 2007 on July 9, 2007
▲A child allowance bill (a 2007 version old bill) submits it to the House of Councilors on December 26, 2007
▲A version old bill submits it to the House of Councilors in 2007 on April 22, 2008
▲A version old bill submits it to the House of Councilors in 2007 on December 11, 2008
◆I announce the version manifesto in 2009 on July 27, 2009
●September, 2009 change of government
▲Draft of a proposed law (a 2010 new bill) presentation about the provision of the child allowance in January 29, 2010 2010
▲In the February 8, 2010 Diet the non-provision to a nursing home child a problem
▲The provision to a child on March 5, 2010 in the Diet resident in a foreign country a problem
▲The March, 2010 2010 new bill approval
◆Each local government starts application guidance in about April, 2010
◆I announce the version manifesto in 2010 on June 17, 2010
▲A child allowance bill after 2011 is going to be approved in the Diet in the spring of 2011
It is a past flow of becoming it high school gratuitousness
■The bill with the age limit was announced, but it was not written in the manifesto for a long term as follows. It is approved before change of government once at the House of Councilors without most of qualified voters knowing the existence of the age limit. By the new bill given two months before the approval, the age limit became extinct without any sign, but there were not the press release or the news that were able to touch it about this matter afterwards.
- It is written that I become high school gratuitousness. However, there is not mention about the age limit.
- That only the student until a day was an object was written in the text before 20-year-old April 1. However, an age limit is not written on a summary and press release announced at the same time. As for this bill, the approval was not rejected, too.
- That only the student until a day was an object was written in the text before 20-year-old April 1. However, an age limit is not written on a summary and press release announced at the same time.
- Democratic Party, nation new party, Communist Party, Social Democratic Party, Keiko Itokazu, Naoki Tanaka, each he of Ryuhei Kawada were agreeable, and Liberal Democratic Party, New Komeito, Reform Club objected. Because it was divided parliament, the approval came to nothing by the House of Representatives without being rejected.
- It is written that I become high school gratuitousness. However, there is not mention about the age limit.
- The high school gratuitousness became the driving force of the Democratic Party progress about becoming it.
- An age limit disappears.
- Democratic Party, nation new party, New Komeito, Communist Party, Social Democratic Party, Keiko Itokazu, each he of Iwao Matsuda were agreeable, and Liberal Democratic Party, Reform Club, Ryuhei Kawada, each he of Tamon Hasegawa objected. A law was passed in this.
◆I announce the version manifesto in 2007 on July 9, 2007
▲A draft of a proposed law (an old bill) that high schools for reduction of the burdens that substantial gratuitousness modifies promotion of becoming it and the education in private high schools on education in the country public high school relate to provision of the money of attendance at school support on March 18, 2008 is presentation in the House of Councilors
▲An old bill submits it to the House of Councilors on March 25, 2009
▲An old bill approves it at the House of Councilors on April 24, 2009
◆I announce the version manifesto in 2009 on July 27, 2009
●September, 2009 change of government
▲The non-collection of the tuition to affect the public high school on January 29, 2010 and a high school submit a draft of a proposed law (a new bill) about the provision of attendance at school support gold
▲A new bill approves it at the House of Representatives and the House of Councilors in March, 2010
Summary
■It will be unbelievable that the mass media, nobody of the member of the Diet submit a problem to have a shown information suddenly for a long term in this way. However, this is Japanese reality. There is that "a bill is totally different from a manifesto" practically, and it shows danger of the judgment ability of the qualified voter that the party takes the government. Therefore the Liberal Democratic Party thinks that it was in a top party there for many years, but…… In addition, why will not the party in rivalry with the Democratic Party make this criticism materials? I want to know the reason.